<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SEO Journalist - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-cec817b2" type="application/json"/><link>http://seojournalist.disqus.com/</link><description>Free SEO Training and Tips. The Knowledge Beihnd The Web</description><atom:link href="http://seojournalist.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:53:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Can I Get A Wikipedia Backlink?</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/02/21/can-i-get-a-wikipedia-backlink/#comment-445373866</link><description>very useful article, Wikipedia will let only to established company to publish page with backlink.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt;oylist</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pay Per Keyword</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:53:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can I Get A Wikipedia Backlink?</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/02/21/can-i-get-a-wikipedia-backlink/#comment-444738326</link><description>Your right about them being a little difficult to acquire, it more time and effort than most people are willing to give, but Wikipedia is a MASSIVE site with very little out bound links compared to most. So the pay off for the backlinks is huge, especially to Google because they take into account the difficulty of getting one approved.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO Journalist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:42:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 750+ Dofollow/Nofollow Forum List</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/12/23/750-dofollownofollow-forum-list-pr-1-8/#comment-444736699</link><description>No problem. I'll be updating the list in a little while, but since I compile and organize everything on my own, its become more of a free time effort. As you can see, its a lot of links to go through, when you update, reorganize and resort the url list.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the feedback.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO Journalist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:39:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 750+ Dofollow/Nofollow Forum List</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/12/23/750-dofollownofollow-forum-list-pr-1-8/#comment-444721482</link><description>wow..lots of dofollow sites. It is hard to get all forum sites in a single post. You have done hard job. Thanks for share.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ahsanul Karim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:08:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can I Get A Wikipedia Backlink?</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/02/21/can-i-get-a-wikipedia-backlink/#comment-444720065</link><description>I have never thought to use Wikipedia for a backlink. It's definitely a powerful site, sure to boost a site's rank, but it is hard to get. I'll try to follow some of your tips you added here.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the help.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ahsanul Karim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:04:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Is Linkbaiting?</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/12/07/what-is-linkbaiting/#comment-444716508</link><description>Thanks for the link baiting article, its provided alot of great information about link baiting and its inner workings. I am hoping to find more useful information from this blog in the future as well…&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the share!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ALEX JOHN</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:56:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Introduces A More User Friendly Menu Bar</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/12/27/google-introduces-a-more-user-friendly-menu-bar/#comment-441037086</link><description>Dropping the Google Scholar from the main menu is a big hassle. It is not just that you have to make more clicks, you also have to retype your query which is often one or two sentences long (e.g. title of journal article). Now consider that those who work in a university use this feature more than two dozen of times each day and you see how dropping Scholar makes the new menu bar less user friendly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:35:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 750+ Dofollow/Nofollow Forum List</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/12/23/750-dofollownofollow-forum-list-pr-1-8/#comment-439656427</link><description>Geeh, I was actually having a heard time finding a reliable forum site. But thanks to this post of yours! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tinavargas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:03:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Backlinks Should I Build?</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/11/21/how-many-backlinks-should-i-build/#comment-438309299</link><description>This is my 4th site actually, but my first heavily researched site. The others first two were a learning experience through different niches and the 3rd was trial and error for a few techniques I wanted to try. Best way to learn I think, personal experience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO Journalist</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:16:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 100 Dofollow Blogs</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/01/10/top-100-dofollow-blogs/#comment-437330139</link><description>Thanks for the huge list...I'm just getting into some heavy SEO...&lt;br&gt;Looks like I'll be spending some time here..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt;Larrymac</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Larrymac</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:46:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Backlinks Should I Build?</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/11/21/how-many-backlinks-should-i-build/#comment-437278970</link><description>with a site in mysterious sandbox i now started how many back links one should have for a new site..bad luck..do research well and then starta new site..this is my experience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dealscook</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:21:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 750+ Dofollow/Nofollow Forum List</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/12/23/750-dofollownofollow-forum-list-pr-1-8/#comment-436772742</link><description>I do all my own SEO so I couldn't recommend one from experience. However, I have heard a lot of good things about a company called Qualified Impressions.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO Journalist</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:53:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Benefits Of Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/11/26/the-benefits-of-social-bookmarking/#comment-435974912</link><description>social media net work have provides good plate form that freely communicate  with friends and other people in all over the world and beside this other most benefits for users.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Headwise.net</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do I Raise My Alexa Rank?</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/01/26/how-do-i-raise-my-alexa-rank/#comment-435051837</link><description>its good and getting links to the alexa mate!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FreeEducationAid</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:39:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 750+ Dofollow/Nofollow Forum List</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/12/23/750-dofollownofollow-forum-list-pr-1-8/#comment-434952901</link><description>Yes, thanks for sharing... I need a good SEO company to help our site (which is in Spanish), any suggestions?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Debi Ramaty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:35:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 750+ Dofollow/Nofollow Forum List</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/12/23/750-dofollownofollow-forum-list-pr-1-8/#comment-432990889</link><description>Best forum list I've found so far, all the links are legitimate, powerful sources.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for sharing!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:33:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Proper Backlink Building Through Blog Commenting</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/02/02/proper-backlink-building-through-blog-commenting/#comment-432856399</link><description>Always wondered about this particular subject...as a marketing man primarily, I've always been opposed to clocking the system vs. actually delivering good service and product. Glad to hear that by bringing valuable contribution to the table, there are reciprocal benefits. Thank you for clearing that up!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glaf Cole</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:32:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 5 Most Powerful Backlink Building Techniques</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2011/11/04/top-5-most-powerful-backlink-building-techniques/#comment-431743782</link><description>We cannot get any advantage in Page Rank with the help of nofollow links but yes it stills play important role in SERP and also sends free traffic. Also for safe side we should make backlinks for our website with combination of dofollow and nofollow</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO Tips</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:02:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Next Google PageRank Update Supposedly Coming Soon</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/01/20/next-google-pagerank-update-supposedly-coming-soon/#comment-431588697</link><description>I still agree with some people who say to register new domains for 5+ years minimum - if you register a domain for 1 year than it tells serps, well why bother, if they don't think they will be in business in a year, than neither do we</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:25:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Next Google PageRank Update Supposedly Coming Soon</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/01/20/next-google-pagerank-update-supposedly-coming-soon/#comment-431584375</link><description>Congratz on the pagerank. This website only jumped to a Pr.1 from a Pr.0. The domain is new though, only a couple months old and Pagerank is always hesitant with new domains. So the next one is where this site will see some significant improvement.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO Journalist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:21:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Proper Backlink Building Through Blog Commenting</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/02/02/proper-backlink-building-through-blog-commenting/#comment-431580346</link><description>Google will always favor the classic quality over quantity rule, which has more than just a few factors. There is the rank of the source page, the reputation of the source domain, the OBL number of that page, etc. The more sources from the same niche the better, even as few as just one backlink per source will be beneficial, not to mention that Google will only index a certain number of backlinks from any one source domain, even if all the backlinks are perfectly legitimate and have high rankings.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO Journalist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:18:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Proper Backlink Building Through Blog Commenting</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/02/02/proper-backlink-building-through-blog-commenting/#comment-431576457</link><description>The article is more of a general statement, because most websites that allow comments use a spam filter that blocks comments with html code imbedded. They see it as spam. However, there are a considerable number of SEO friendly blogs that give instructions on how to leave your link. More often then not, it will be as your commenting title name, rather than within the comment. If you can pull off a comment with a backlink within the text then by all means do so, but just because you can doesn't mean you won't get flagged, that's my experience, so I don't recommend it unless the site states specifically. Keep in mind that bigger sites are usually the ones that par-take in this because they can afford the high OBL amount.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO Journalist</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:13:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Proper Backlink Building Through Blog Commenting</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/02/02/proper-backlink-building-through-blog-commenting/#comment-431169896</link><description>I haven't really been bothered much with link building in the past and my main site is about 2 years old and getting good traffic.  The last three months however, I have really gotten into blog commenting - it's the only place I have actively tried to get links.  I don't care what the pr of the site is, whether the link I get is dofollow or nofollow - I don't really care.  In fact I never ever even bother to look!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I care about is whether I enjoy the blog I am reading, and want to come back again and again.  As I said on another comment on this blog, my site pr went from 0 to 2 in Feb 2012 just by actively getting involved on less than a dozen sites that I really like and trying to add decent discussion to the article at hand.  It adds good value/content for the author who wrote the article, maybe it gives me a dofollow link, maybe it doesn't.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PR isn't everything anyway, I haven't cared about it much in the past and I have sites with zero pr that can rank really well for highly competitive key phrases.  I think if most people just concentrate on creating good content and information on subjects they really enjoy and participate in a community of blogs that they are interested in whether related to their site or not, then the traffic and dollars will eventually come without them having to trick Google into anything nor have to buy their way in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps Ms Google understands that if it finds 1000 links to your site from 1000 different blogs to not pay it attention, but pays attention to multiple links wrapped around some decent text, coming from a couple of handfuls of sites you enjoy?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:37:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Next Google PageRank Update Supposedly Coming Soon</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/01/20/next-google-pagerank-update-supposedly-coming-soon/#comment-431144047</link><description>My site finally got off the mark on 6th feb (well was 7th of Feb here in OZ) and went from zero to two.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:09:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Proper Backlink Building Through Blog Commenting</title><link>http://www.seojournalist.com/2012/02/02/proper-backlink-building-through-blog-commenting/#comment-430748188</link><description>quick question, i thought it was considered good practice to leave an anchor text link within the comment field using the your main keyword. But from your article it says that's a bad idea? Could you clarify this please. Are you saying instead of using an anchor text, it is better to put the web page link in the URL field?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maring</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:14:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
